Recap from PDP/X-SLT March 2008; revised 5 May 2008
DOG-MA DISEASE DETECTIVES
Design Team: Tiffani Quan (DTL), Frank Black, Patrick Yuh
Design Team Facilitator & Teaching Consultant: Lisa Hunter
Audience:
MARC/MBRS/CAMP summer institute @ UCSC - June 30th to July 3rd
~15 junior level undergraduate students majoring in Molecular, Cell & Developmental Biology (MCD), Biochemistry (BMB), Chemistry or Biomolecular Engineering (BME)
prior knowledge: organic chemistry, introductory biology series (20s)
under-represented in sciences
Goals:
1 - develop accurate understanding of central dogma (DNA → RNA → protein) by using evidence and experimental results
2 - using experimental evidence to explain interpretations and hypotheses when communicating orally, in presentations and in writing
3 - be able to synthesize results from multiple experiments to formulate a “big picture”
4 - develop a testable hypothesis based upon empirical evidence and use it to make predictions
5 - students will gain exposure to experimental results obtained from actual techniques used by scientists to bridge their textbook and lecture knowledge to a more practical/applied lab setting
Activity description: ItalicText(rationale)ItalicText
Introduce the disease situation (no more than 15min)
- transition into techniques?
- brainstorm about cell components that can cause disease
(beginning of ownership by choosing areas of study)
3 Starter stations (1hr total) - groups 1 and 2 will swap halfway thru group 3’s time
1 - DNA: agarose gels, spec (15min)
2 - RNA: array data, spec (15min)
3 - protein: gel set up, stained gel, spec (absorbance and activity) (30min)
(assess prior knowledge of material, techniques; goal #5)
Data collection in small groups at the starter stations
- set up 2 variables (X & Y)
- each small group will collect data on only X or Y
Pair discussions within X and Y (15min discussion time, 5min poster prep)
- discussion, data analysis
- relationship between DNA, RNA, and protein?
- poster prep
(informal communication; start to develop a community; goal #1 & #2)
X and Y group discussion (no more than 15min)
- share out with informal posters (giant post-its) to the rest of their group (X or Y)
- form a group model
(goal #1 & #2)
Big group discussion (10min)
- compare/share models
- discuss how different data may suggest different models?
(goal #3)
~ break ~
Split into X and Y
- inform students which of their samples have the disease
Pair discussions within X and Y (5min)
- what about DNA, RNA, and/or protein causes disease?
- form a hypothesis
(goal #4)
X and Y group discussion (10min)
- share out hypotheses (goal #2)
Jigsaw X and Y groups into new groups of 4 students (students should not be the partners from the first part of the activity) (10min discussion, 5min presentation prep)
- discussion
- new model for why DNA, RNA, protein can cause disease
(goal #2, #3 & #4)
Big group discussion (10min)
- share out new models (goal #2)
Synthesis (10 min)
Things to work on for next time:
- what disease are we going to use? real or fictional? optical related?
- what protein can we use that has an easy functional/activity assay?
- Patrick: sketch out 10 sample dogs for DNA, RNA, and protein levels
- decide on leaders for each starter
- decide on leaders for group X, group Y and the intro/synthesis
- poster making supplies from Malika?
Next meeting will be the week of May 19th when we should have most of the answers for the above questions. Things to decide next time:
- date and audience for practice run
- outline/determine specifics for introduction, starter intros, synthesis
- think about facilitation: prompts for discussion, prompts during small groups, etc.
2008-11-22
2008-10-23
2008-10-21
2008-10-05
2008-09-27
2008-09-26
2008-09-11
2008-09-04
2008-09-02
2008-08-28
2008-08-27
2008-08-26
2008-08-22
2008-08-21
2008-08-13
2008-08-12
2008-08-07